Second Sudanese Civil War

-a conflict that lasted from 1983-2005 between the central Sudanese government and the people of Sudan
- about 2 million people died in this conflict, famine/disease/etc.
- 4 million were displaced during the war
- caused by the government shutting down Christian ministries in Sudan
- government was taking lands from farmers in order to retrieve oil
- armies enlisted child soldiers
- peace agreements were made in 2005

CIA questions

1. 313,847,465 

2. China, India, United States, Indonesia, Brazil

3. 190,291,129

4. Democracy

5. 95%

6. Russia

7. Mexico

8. China

9. Saudi Arabia

10. United States

11. United States

12. yes

13. Gross Domestic Product

14. Liechtenstein, 141,100

15. no

16. Africa

17. Africa

18. India

19. 18th

20. no

21. 23.9%

22. 76.5%

23. 3.11 immigrants per 1000 people

24. no

25. 7 billion 

Evaluating Websites

1.       Yes, because the CIA is a trustworthy organization. Many professional people work for the CIA and they would most likely not post false information on their own website. I would use this as a primary source for a research paper.

2.       Yes, because PBS is an educational program. The goal of their website is to give knowledge and information to others so they wouldn’t post anything that is false. I would probably use this on a research paper.

3.       No, because there is not enough information about the sources and the author. When I went on this website, there was no information besides the author’s name. Also, they ‘author’ never posted where they got any of the information from. This would not be a reliable source for a research paper.

4.       Yes, because NASA is a well-known organization and very trustworthy. NASA is very well known across the globe so they would never write something that isn’t true. I would defiantly use it as a primary source.

5.       Yes, because CNN is a news source and many people use it as place to learn more about current events. I used CNN at my old school for research on many topics. They are very reliable and keep up to date on current event. I would use it as a primary source.

6.       Yes, because New York Times is a reliable news source. New York Times is a new paper as well as a website and they are very trustworthy when it comes to giving out correct information. I would use this as a source.

7.       No, because Fox News is not always reliable with some news stories. I’ve heard from many people that Fox News sometimes twists their news stories to make them more entertaining and boost their ratings. I would probably not use them as a source

8.       Sort of, because Wikipedia can sometimes be a reliable source but not always. Some of the pages on Wikipedia are protected and people cannot make edits on them. But on others, anyone could write anything on it. So, if the thing I am looking up is well-known, like Barack Obama, I would use it as a way to learn more about the person but not as a source for a research paper.

9.       No, because we don’t know if Mr. Schick is correct on all of his information and there are no editors besides him. Anyone could make a website just like Mr. Schick but you don’t know if it’s reliable or not. Since Mr. Schick is my teacher, I can trust him but not the websites on blogger. 

Essays

                Arête, to me, means to show excellence in anything or any kind. It can also mean to show your highest potential or doing the best you can. Knowledge or wisdom could also be used as words similar to arête. The ancient Greeks demonstrated arête by creating their own government that no one has ever used before. They also created cities out of nothing and made outstanding governments within them. Also, the ancient Greeks discovered things about astronomy and agriculture. They accomplished many obstacles in human history, and that is how they demonstrate arête.

                Elbert Hubbard and Socrates were both really intelligent people. They saw life threw a pair of rose colored glasses and understood things that a normal person would ever think of. I think if they both traveled to modern day America, they would be surprised on how much things are developed. They would probably be shocked on how the government grew. They would probably be disappointed on how people don’t think for themselves and just use technology to think for them. I think they would both agree that the world changed dramatically in both good and bad ways. For example, I think they would both be satisfied that their names are remembered and teachers talk about their life and methods of learning.  But they probably wouldn’t like that our world is now all computer based and not a lot of people use logic in their everyday lives. We tend to depend on our phones and internet to give us answers or the latest news on something, which is not really a trustful source. But in Elbert Hubbard and Socrate’s life, they had to actually think about a situation and find a truthful source for an answer.

                During the next four years at John Carroll, I want to achieve the best grades I possibly can while also maintain a healthy social life with my friends. To accomplish this goal, I would have to study really hard for any graded assessments and put forth my best effort on everything I do. I would have to still take breaks and have to make sure the friendships and relationships in my life are healthy. Also, I would have to finish all my homework and never slack off or procrastinate which is going to be pretty challenging, but it is possible. School is the highest priority so sometimes I will have to stop socializing and focus everything on my work. I will have to be prepared for class and focus on the teacher and what he or she is saying. This plan is going to be difficult to maintain sometimes but I know I can if I put worth my greatest effort.